Home | Hegemony | Archives | Blogroll | Resume | Links | RSS Feed | subscribe by email    


to Reason

Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprise....During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less, in all places, pride and indolence in the clergy; ignorance and servility in laity; in both, superstition, bigotry, and persecution.
    --James Madison

All the old blogs
are gone now

or the people
are different.

You are either with us or against us.
Bogus Defamations of Character

Clinton attacked critics of the bill as "unpatriotic": "There is nothing patriotic about pretending that you can love your country but despise your government." This is breathtaking since it includes, at one time or another, most of us. Put another way, was a German in 1939 who said that he detested the Nazi dictatorship unpatriotic?
    --On the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act; Gore Vidal, Civil Liberties, 4/21/2002.

The only thing more anti-American than radical groups that actually want to destroy America (both from inside and outside) are all the Americans labelling eachother as anti-American. It's the oldest trick in the book.

If what we mean by "America" is synonomous with "democracy" and "freedom" or the "American people" the term as used in the majority of cases is completely nonsensical. Certain officials from high places have made statements affirming this on a repeated basis, I have been lead to believe that it is true, at least as pertains to our intentions. Yet it's a recurring problem of late that those who voice minority dissent will be attacked with ad hominem, and that such attacks will be given the credence of a rational debate merely for their rhetorical and lazy appeal.

The term does little to foster discussion, but in an atmosphere of unmitigated and bone-deep nationalism it succeeds in fostering hate. The term's usage and it's resemblance, however slim in practice if not spirit, to the scare of the 1950s should be troubling enough without using it to simply end an argument, or the lack of argument, with name calling or outright misrepresentation of the opposing view.

Nothing I have seen that has been labelled anti-American in the media since 9/11 has actually been anti-American minus the hate groups attempting to turn our mothers into mashed goo. Least of all, say, Bill Maher's weak attacks on the 'intelligence' establishment and a rather banal point about dropping bombs on little brown people, yet his 'anti-American' speech was enough to send corporate advertisers running for the hills. Sillier than that but less surprising is FOX News running a story about peace assemblies with the headline "Peace Protests - Anti-American?". One would have to be willing to wipe out the bulk of the substance of the US Constitution to consider this a valid question, and reinforces the false dichotomy that so much of the name calling hinges upon.

In much the same fashion that the idea of "Islamic fundamentalism" has been confused with the actual source of violence - that is radical Islamic fanaticism - this coinage for dissent has served only to marginalize contributors to the polemic with a flip of a fallacious argument. It's one thing to ignore what someone has to say; it's another to try and cast non-violent protesters into the same lot as McVeigh and Bin Laden.

It might be one thing if these "anti-American" Americans, or whoever, were burning American flags, say, which would at least poise a matter for debate. It would at least suggests a pretty anti-America-as-an-idea kind of sentiment, though it would be practical to ask the one with the match what exactly they mean to say about it. There's nothing anti-American about burning the US flag in opposition to policies of the US government. It might be worthwhile criticizing the symbolism entailed in the act, or their chosen means for communication, but criticizing somebody who has pointed criticisms to offer for simply having expressed their criticism... Well, it's un-American. The price of Democracy is having to put up with people you disagree with. And before jumping down my throat that I'm just trying to silence anyone who disagrees with myself, it should be pointed out that the only silence I want is the silence of calls for silence, and I would argue that this is something basic and fundamental to democracy and liberty, which in the end are my core ideologies in some literal unambivalent fashion. Presumably a sentiment I share in some respect with everybody else in this fool country.

Suggesting that the left is helping terrorists by questioning US policy is absurd. "Not so!" yell various factions on the right. Yeah, the left isn't always innocent either; hypocrasy in this country runs rampant whenever the act of criticism itself becomes criticized. Factions on both the left and the right are guilty of trying to silence others, but whether there's a difference in degree hardly matters, such behavior stems from authoritarian attitudes that exist quite independent of political colors. What matters is that it happens at all: it indicates that the democratic ideals that do, in fact, make the West great, have not taken as strong a foothold in the West as we'd like to believe.

With the easy media access and easier access to funding that organizations such as AVOT recieve (Madam Vice President Lynne Cheney presiding), it's disturbingly easy for them to loudmouth their crackbait theories on "American exceptionalism" in mass media and foisting degrees of censorship onto peace advocates, leftists, liberals, and moderates. One would almost be ready to believe that anyone criticizing the American government at all holds a de facto hatred towards America itself, if the idea weren't so patently absurd.

Their refusal to accept criticism of what may be the greatest human civilization in all of history (whatever we agree 'great', 'human', 'civilization' and 'history' might actually mean) is certainly endemic in certain quarters, particularly neoconservatives. Whining brimstone at the likes of Jimmy Carter because questioning the President's choice of words will "weaken our resolve" hardly counts as consideration of the question of whether or not the President chose his words wisely. AVOT's mission is to attack the rational of voicing criticism, not the criticism itself - the debate they've entered is about whether or not we should be having a debate. What Norman Podhoretz et al don't seem to grasp is that being the "greatest" is not synonymous with "perfection". This just represents another crisis of democracy; an untoward end the likes of William Bennet would enjoy foisting on us.

Would-be censors are always riddled with hypocrasy. They want free speech for themselves and none for people they disagree with. Simple refutation isn't enough. It is an act of domination, of thought-policing, of authoritarianism. More often than not it is simply a demonstration of fear and paranoia, feelings that result in the kind of totalitarian behavior we are trying to prevent through censorship.

But the left does this - some activists try to distrupt speeches and outshout or censor public speakers; liberals try to pass thought-crime anti-hate legislation. Rather than better parenting or strengthening our educational institutions social conservatives on the right turn to censoring sex and violence on TV (frankly I'm of the mind that we should be ripping our TVs out of the wall and tossing them into the street, and if I actually owned a TV I would do so. Presumably I'm not the only one), or ban rock music, or burn books that are somehow "dangerous". None of it is proper. None of it is just. Irrational hatreds are a problem, but the expression of irrational hatred is something I see no reason to either listen to or attempt to silence when I can denounce it for what it is. It is a waste of energy to try and censor its existence - hate is as basic a human emotion as love and it's unlikely either will ever disappear. Censorship adds fuel to the fury and sense of righteousness of hate groups, they could just as easily be refuted. Their ideas are laughable, and laughter would be an appropriate response. Why should we pretend to be frightened by ignorance? How can sense prevail when the sensible engage in the senseless?

Threatening speech is another matter entirely - the two need to be distinguished, and are largely distinguishable. The one is merely obnoxious, the other is intimidating, and in the latter case intentional. Announcing the fact that you are a racist bigott is not expressing an intention to lynch the next black man you see - it is not the same as shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theatre. If it incites violence the speaker is not the criminal actor so much as those who turn to violence rather than the other cheek, or more appropriately to hoots of skeptical degradation for the logical fallacies inherent in racist bigottries.

But what about the young? You can't protect the young from ideas, as soon as you send them out into the world the ideas start rushing in, assuming parents or family haven't already inducted the young into the halls of bigotry and sexism themselves. You can try to teach them to think critically (I've heard social conservatives argue that such a skill cannot be taught: this is not convincing, a course in basic logic is a good starting point, simply pointing out common logical fallacies can give a young person enough ammo to shread most of what passes for education at Sunday school - then again perhaps that's what social conservatives are afraid of), to value their freedom and to recognize that that freedom is inevitably tied to the freedom of others. Or you can try indoctrinating them with authoritarian religious dogma and make them more likely to adopt other authoritarian dogmas. The best lesson life has to offer is that we are all fools. Once that fact is realized living among one's fellow man becomes much easier.

Anyone who promotes Western values and then turns around and promotes censorship has committed as deep an act of hypocrasy as is possible. Fundemental to the right to free speech is the right to listen to whom one wants - acting to censor the expression of ideas tramples our freedoms and insults our intelligence.

I won't even advocate censoring Hitler and Nazis inuendos, such as the one quoted at the top of the page, and that's something that makes me more sick and tired than just about anything else.

Frankly I find nothing more American, nothing more demonstratably fine about the human intellect, nothing more appealing to the senses, than the capacity to put disagreements aside, pay respect to one another's rugged individualism, dogmatic faith, or bleeding-heart secular humanism, and buy eachother another round.

Pass over that motherfucking bong Falwell.

There's something I've been thinking about that sort of ties in here: the almost obligatory construct of left/skeptical arguments which begins, "Of course X is very bad, but." As in, "Of course suicide bombs are very bad, but Israel has only exacerbated the situation."

It's a construct I find incredibly offensive, to say the very least, because it puts me, and those who share my perspective, in the position of having to defend our very humanity. Jesus H. Christ on a crutch--of course I am repelled by suicide bombers. Of course I am shocked and saddened by the senseless deaths of Israeli citizens. Do I have to say this every time? Do I have to begin every speech with a disclaimer, that I do not beat my dog or steal candy from small children, or tear the wings off of helpless insects?

Bullshit on that.

[List Headings] [Older Entries]

journals, notes,
other curmudgeonry

- A Timeline -

Oil for Nothing:
US Holds On Humanitarian Supplies
Iraq: 1997-2001

the good book
and other cultural

The Autobiography
Mother Jones

Contact Info:

red cards,
my wicked past,
and other causes for suspicion

Chicago Branch
IU 660 and IU 560.

The American Civil Liberties Union

radio libre

Union Label

random shit i've read

do less
agenda for justice
cool earth
sweat free trade
boycott war
jewish voice for peace
fair trade
no eat fishies
'responsible investing'
social funds
starve the fox
war resisters league
war tax escrow account
war tax assistance fund
working world

do it yourfuckingself
bioenergy lists
diy network
george's solar workshop
open source ecology
open source machining

ignorance costs money, education is free
open courseware
oer commons
flat world knowledge
kutz business
open university

beating congress with a stick
find your reps

beating the media with a stick
national contact list
youth media council

foreign relations
Americas Program
Center for Defense Information
Coallition for a Realistic Foreign Policy
Council on Hemispheric Affairs
Foreign Policy In Focus
ICRC Customary International Law
Interdisciplines: Terrorism
National Priorities Project
Nautilus Institute
Project on Defense Alternatives
Project to Enforce the Geneva Conventions
Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission
World Policy Institute

foreign interventions
Foreign Affairs
Institute for Strategic Studies
Middle East Policy Council
  [conflict statistics]

is this some sort of joke?
Rahm Emanuel
Foreign Policy

long emergencies
the smalley group

Center for International Policy
Foreign Aid Watch
Global Security
Maps of War
UN Peacekeeping

national defense
Defense and the National Interest
Inspector General of the DOD [mil]
Nuclear Policy Research Institute
Sunshine Project

military assistance
Econ. Allied for Arms Reduction
Fed. of American Scientists
[us arms transfers]
[gov. documents, crs]
Defense Security Cooperation Agency [mil]
[arms sales notification]
[customer guide]
[EDA Database]

Center for Economic and Policy Research
Center for Popular Economics
Congressional Research Center
Drumm Major Institute
Earth Institute
Economic Policy Institute
Focus on the Global South
Global Trade Watch
Levy Institute
Molinari Institute
Political Economy Research Institute
real-world economics review
U-Tex Inequality Project - UTIP

capital ownership group
global justice movement
world social forum

Bretton Woods Project

sustainable development
Apollo Alliance
Oxfam International

human rights
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch
International Crisis Group

human relief
Mercy Corps

Second Vermont Republic

Breaking the Silence.
Courage to Refuse.
Foundation for Middle East Peace.
If Americans Knew.
International Solidarty.

peace, drugs, and war
American Friends Service Committee
American Gulf War Vets
Drug Policy Alliance
Economists for Peace and Security
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Friends Committee on National Legislation
From the Wilderness
Nonviolence International
Notre Dame's Sanctions Project
Traprock Peace Center
Veterans Against the Iraq War

civil liberties
Center for Constitutional Rights
Elec. Freedom Foundation [EFF]
Elec. Privacy Info Center [EPIC]
Privacy International

state corruption
Transparency International

gender equality

racial equality

American Rights at Work
Fair Trade Federation [*]
International Centre for Prison Studies
International Confederation of Trade Unions
International Labor Rights Fund
Labour Research Association
SweatShop Watch
Take Back Your Time
Work Less Party

Ag Policy Center
Center for Rural Affairs
Corporate Agribusiness Examiner
Environmental Working Group

Basel Action Network
Buffalo Field Campaign
Global Warming in Pictures
Journal of Int. Wildlife Law and Policy
Organization & Environment
North Pole Observatory
Republicans for Environmental Protection
Rocky Mountain Institutes
Society for Ecological Restoration
Union of Concerned Scientists
World Wildlife Fund, International

Education Commission of the States
PBS - School Funding

Growing Without Schooling
Sudbury Valley School

the republic
Center for Responsibe Politics
Century Foundation
Democratic Freedom Caucus
FairVote: Election Reform
Federal Election Commission
Follow the Oil Money
Open Congress
Government Information Awareness

death and taxes
Taxpayers for Common Sense
Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights

faith in social justice
Ontario Consultants
faithful america
American Council for Judaism
Jewish Council on Urban Affairs

Reclaim Democracy

hangdogs and bloodhounds
Alternative Press Center
Democratic Media
Consumers Union
Journal of Electronic Publishing
Media Lens
Media Matters
Media Reform Network
Media Transparency
Project Censored
PR Watch
Public Citizen

physicians for a national health program
healthcare now!
single payer action

Center for Science in the Public Interest
Free Software Foundation
The Daily WTF
Worse Than Failure

Chicago Council on Foreign Relations
Harris Poll
PEW Research Center [party identification]
Polling Report
PollKatz - George II Averages
Polstate - Illlinois
National Council of Public Polls

econ data
Center For International Comparisons
[Penn World Tables]
BEA Digital Library
Data Buffet
Derived M3
Economic Time Series
Executive Compensation Data
Gapminder World
GPI: Progress Indicator
Groningen Growth & Development Center [GDP Per Hour]
Inflation Calculator
EPI JobWatch
Luxemborg Income Study
Purchase Power Parity adjusted GDP and Per Capita GDP
UN Human Development Indicators
UN Population Info Network
UN World Population Database
US Bureau of Labor Statistics
[real earnings]
[Employment Situation Summary]
[Legacy Statistical Graphs]
US Bureau of Economic Statistics
US Dollar Index (CEC)
US International Trade Commision: Tariff Info Center
World Bank Development Data
World Bank Inequality Data

government services
Bureau of Democracy
Census Bureau
Congressional Budget Office
General Accounting Office
Office of Foreign Assets Control
National Health Expenditure Data

Congressional Research Service
Harvard Project on Cold War Studies
National Security Archives
NSA @ Chadwyck
Public Information Research
Studies in Intelligence, CIA

reference desk
US Government Spending
Nation Master Country Statistics
Polity IV Project
1up Info Country Guide
Columbia Encyclopedia
Hartford World History Archives
Investor Glossary
Library of Congress
The Presidential Recording Center
ReadPrint Library
Snopes Urban Legends
Wayback Machine
White, Matt - 20th Century
World Info by E.G. Matthews

online libraries
Project Gutenberg
Cornell's 'Making of America'

the gospel according to labour
anarchist archives
anarchist FAQ
anarcho-syndicalism 101
the voluntaryist

beards and mops
benjamin tucker
joseph proudhon
lysander spooner
lucy parsons
mother jones
the labadie collection

from the shell of the old
Arizmendi Bakery
Ithaca Health Alliance
Mondragon CC
South End Press
US Fed. of Worker Cooperatives