Interesting. Anyway, after this little spat and doing a bit of reading up on anti-terror during Clinton's watch, Les makes some gentle reminders about the score card. Bush, by comparison, was a lot of talk and no action: "after concluding that bin Laden's group had carried out the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole - a conclusion stated without hedge in a Feb. 9 briefing for Vice President Cheney - the new administration did not choose to order armed forces into action." Instead he was threatening presidential vetos if SDI funds were redirected into counter-terrorism. Foreign policy always looks so bipartisan.
Yee haw.
your turing test:
Oil for Nothing:US Holds On Humanitarian SuppliesIraq: 1997-2001
the good book and other cultural artifacts