Home | Hegemony | Archives | Blogroll | Resume | Links | RSS Feed | subscribe by email    

Flagrancy

to Reason

 

blog roll


    Wouter over at Stand Down dir..., 2003-03-19 00:00:00 | Main | Christopher Allbritton is movi..., 2003-03-21 00:00:00

    N Demosthenes pointed out a debate going on at BeltwayBloggers over the war, with conservatives going back and forth. Donny Ferguson is heading an anti-war argument that even I disagree with, but that's because his foreign policy isn't really libertarian but pure interventionist neo-con, and he apparently thinks the US should actually go back to actively supporting Saddam. And if it's leftist it has to go.

    His argument against war is that Saddam is better for US interests because he kills Islamic radicals, and he thinks democracy delivered at the end of a US gun will lead to Islamic radicals taking control of Iraq. I doubt the US will let the latter happen, and as recently occurred in Turkey, Islamist governments aren't always evil ghouls in league with terrorists. I'm still waiting to see what the US means by "liberation", I really don't think what Ferguson describes is a possible outcome.


:: posted by buermann @ 2003-03-20 00:00:00 CST | link





    go ahead, express that vague notion
    Name:
    Email:
    Homepage:
    Comment

    your turing test:

journals, notes,
and
other curmudgeonry

Enforcing
American
Hegemony
- A Timeline -

Oil for Nothing:
US Holds On Humanitarian Supplies
Iraq: 1997-2001


the good book
and other cultural
artifacts


The Autobiography
of
Mother Jones


Contact Info:
buermann[at]
flagrancy[dot]net



"Any man who is not a radical at 20 has no heart. A man who is not a cynic at 50 has no mind."